Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alvarado

Decided: February 11, 1988.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARTHUR ALVARADO AND CITY OF NEWARK DEFENDANTS



Walls, J.s.c.

Walls

As a self insurer, Newark is legally mandated to provide uninsured motorist coverage to its employees such as here to the policeman who, while driving a municipally-owned automobile, sustained personal injuries because of the collision with his vehicle by one driven by an uninsured motorist. Christy v. Newark, 102 N.J. 598 (1986).

At the time of the collision, May 29, 1983, the employed policeman was also covered and protected by his own privately obtained, uninsured motorist insurance coverage provided by Allstate Insurance Company, the plaintiff herein. By this motion, plaintiff seeks resolution in its favor of the following questions:

Should the Christy, the judicially prescribed, uninsured motorist, coverage of the municipality be deemed primary in satisfaction of any liability prior to that of the protection bought and paid for by the employee from a private carrier?

Additionally, now that Newark is deemed the provider of uninsured motorist coverage, must it submit controversies arising from such coverage to arbitration?

The following discussion compels the conclusion that those questions be answered adversely to the interests of the moving party.

Allstate demands that Newark furnish primary coverage of its uninsured motorist benefits to the injured employee Alvarado for one reason, i.e., Allstate's policy with Alvarado says so:

"If there is another applicable similar insurance, we will pay only our share of the loss. Our share is the proportion that our limit of liability bears to the total of all applicable limits. However, any insurance we provide with respect to a vehicle you do not own shall be excess over any other collectible insurance."

Obviously, such a contractual understanding between this carrier and its insured is not binding upon Newark, a nonparty to the agreement of insurance. Without more, Newark may be affected by, but cannot be directly obligated to such terms.

On the other hand, Newark argues that Allstate should pay its benefits first and contends that earlier decisions of our

appellate courts countenance such an approach. Montedoro v. Asbury Park, 174 N.J. Super. 305 (App.Div.1980); State Farm Mutual Auto Liab. v. Kiser, 168 N.J. Super. 230 (App.Div.1979); Walkowitz v. Royal Globe Insurance Company, 149 N.J. Super. 442 (App.Div.1977); Transport of New Jersey v. Watler, 161 N.J. Super. 453 (App.Div.1978); Mortimer v. Peterkin, 170 N.J. Super. 598 (App.Div.1979).

From these, Newark, in its brief, seems to conclude that there is a judicial predilection to favor the interests of a municipality ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.