UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
March 25, 1985
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GILMORE, ROBERT JAMES, ROBERT GILMORE, APPELLANT
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal No. 83-00157) District Judge: Honorable Alan N. Bloch
Before: SEITZ and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges, and GILES, District Judge*fn*
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and was submitted under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) on March 19, 1985.
Appellant Robert James Gilmore contends (1) that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting into evidence allegedly prejudicial testimony by a police officer concerning the seizure of certain physical evidence during the execution of a search warrant; (2) the prosecutor's closing argument was improper and denied appellant a fair trial and (3) appellant's constitutional rights were violated by the trial court's denial of his motion for a continuance.
After considering the contentions raised by appellant, it is
ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.