Decided: June 9, 1977.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
WILLMORE MCCAIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Fritz, Ard and Pressler.
[150 NJSuper Page 498]
The sole ground urged on defendant's appeal is that his sentence of two to three years in State prison, imposed after his violation of at least one of the conditions of his prior probation and upon his guilty plea to that violation, was excessive. He seeks a return to probation.
We are not impressed with his claim that the admitted violation*fn1 -- his counsel acknowledged that "Mr. McCain
[150 NJSuper Page 499]
really never did report to the probation department almost from the very commencement of the probationary term imposed" -- is a "technical violation." Reporting procedures present, as prime purposes, an opportunity for the authorities to detect other violations and, in the appropriate case, to help a defendant avoid them. Frustration of these purposes by a failure to report is, it seems to us, a quite substantial and serious violation. Additionally, protection of the public depends in part on maximum contact between the probation officer and the probationer.
Be this as it may, the fact of the matter is that probation upon a suspended sentence is a privilege the right to which must be earned anew each day until the probationary period expires. When a defendant "fails to meet the test or chance of freedom" he may be committed to prison. In re White , 18 N.J. 449, 455 (1955). We see no reason why society should not expect one who has erred to conform meticulously to every condition on which his freedom depends, including such things as reporting to the probation department.
We discern no mistaken exercise of discretion in the revocation of probation or the sentence imposed. State v. Moretti , 50 N.J. Super. 223 (App. Div. 1958).