Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mandelbaum v. State

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division


Decided: June 29, 1976.

MARVIN H. MANDELBAUM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Allcorn, Kole and Ard.

Per Curiam

[142 NJSuper Page 324]

Plaintiff, a resident of Bergen County, appeals the rejection of his application for employment as a county detective in Union County because of his nonresidency in Union County. His challenge is to the constitutionality of the residency requirements as established by the controlling statute, namely, N.J.S.A. 11:22-7.

We perceive no constitutional infirmity or impropriety in the provisions or effect of N.J.S.A. 11:22-7. McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service Comm'n , U.S. , 96 S. Ct. 1154, 47 L. Ed. 2d 366 (1976); Abrahams v. Civil Service Comm'n , 65 N.J. 61 (1974). See Troy Hills Village v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp. Council , 68 N.J. 604 (1975); David v. Vesta Co. , 45 N.J. 301 (1965); N.J. Restaurant Ass'n v. Holderman , 24 N.J. 295 (1957). See also, Dunne v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. , 69 N.J. 244 (1976).

It very well may be that the subsequent enactments adopted by the Legislature in 1972 excepting from the residency requirements of the Civil Service Act applicants for appointment to a municipal fire department (N.J.S.A. 40A:14-9.2) and applicants for appointment to a municipal police department (N.J.S.A. 40A:14-122.2) themselves offend the equal protection proscription of the Constitution

[142 NJSuper Page 325]

-- although we express no opinion thereon. However this may be, the constitutional invalidity of either or both of these excepting statutes would not affect the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 11:22-7.

So far as concerns N.J.S.A. 40A:9-1, its provisions in no way concern the class or classes of persons covered by N.J.S.A. 11:22-7. In any event and as earlier indicated, even assuming the constitutional invalidity of N.J.S.A. 40A:9-1 because the excepted offices (most, if not all, of which are appointed for fixed terms) do not form or constitute a reasonable and proper class, that invalidity would in no way affect the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 11:22-7.

To the extent that it espouses a contrary view, the case of Trainor v. Newark , 137 N.J. Super. 570 (Ch. Div. 1975), is hereby overruled.

Affirmed.

19760629


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.