Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Akridge v. Barres

Decided: February 23, 1973.

DEREK THOMAS AKRIDGE AND THE BRONZE SHIELDS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ANTHONY BARRES, CHIEF OF POLICE, CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT



Lora, Allcorn and Crane.

Per Curiam

It is no longer open to question that the members of a police department "in many respects constitute a military organization," 16 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d ed., 1972 rev'd vol.), ยง 45.16, at 621, and as such are necessarily subject to reasonable regulations having to do with discipline and morale. Ward v. Keenan , 3 N.J. 298 (1949); Rivell v. Civil Service Commission , 115 N.J. Super. 64 (App. Div. 1971), certif. den. 59 N.J. 269 (1971); Newark v. Massey , 93 N.J. Super. 317 (App. Div. 1967); N.J.S.A. 40A:14-118.

The police department has a proper and legitimate interest in the appearance of its members, including the

length and style of head and facial hair. Cf. Anderson v. Laird , 437 F.2d 912, 915 (7 Cir. 1971), cert. den. 404 U.S. 865, 92 S. Ct. 68, 30 L. Ed. 2d 109 (1971). Contrary to plaintiff's contention, such a regulation does not offend any First Amendment rights of the members of the police department. As was stated in Richards v. Thurston , 424 F.2d 1281, 1283 (1 Cir. 1971), in disposing of a similar contention with regard to a dispute concerning the hair length of a public school student:

See, United States v. O'Brien , 391 U.S. 367, 376, 88 S. Ct. 1673, 20 L. Ed. 2d 672 (1968), reh. den. 393 U.S. 900, 89 S. Ct. 63, 21 L. Ed. 2d 188 (1968); Raderman v. Kaine , 411 F.2d 1102 (2 Cir. 1969), cert. dism., 396 U.S. 976, 90 S. Ct. 467, 24 L. Ed. 2d 447 (1969). See generally, Olff v. East Side Union High School District , 404 U.S. 1042, 92 S. Ct. 703, 30 L. Ed. 2d 736 (1972); Comment, 84 Harv. L. Rev. 1702 (1971). Compare, Friedman v. Froehlke , 470 F.2d 1351 (1 Cir. 1972).

Affirmed.

19730223 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.