Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Russell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT


decided: February 11, 1969.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. ROBERT BRUCE HUNTT, H-6123, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY E. RUSSELL, WARDEN

McLaughlin, Kalodner and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Author: Per Curiam

In the instant case the relator Huntt petitioned the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he had been deprived of his constitutional rights in that (1) he was not provided with counsel at his extradition hearings; (2) he was denied the effective and adequate assistance of counsel at his trial; (3) he was so prejudiced as to be denied due process when at the commencement of his trial his co-defendant changed his plea from "not guilty" to "guilty"; and (4) he received a "harsher sentence" than his co-defendant because he chose to exercise his constitutional right to a trial by jury, in contravention of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The stated contentions of the relator were painstakingly and exhaustively considered seriatim in the excellent opinion of Judge Joseph S. Lord, III, of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. We subscribe in every respect to Judge Lord's disposition and his Order denying the relator's petition for the habeas corpus writ will accordingly be affirmed.

We desire to note our appreciation of the indefatigable and commendable representation of the relator on this appeal by his court-appointed counsel, David Pittinsky, Esq.

19690211

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.