Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Schwartz v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division


Decided: February 14, 1968.

FRANK H. SCHWARTZ AND LOUISE SCHWARTZ, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Gaulkin, Lewis and Kolovsky.

Per Curiam

[99 NJSuper Page 224]

The facts of the case and the terms of the policy are set forth in Judge Botter's opinion reported in 96 N.J. Super. 520 (Law Div. 1967). He concluded "Since the facts before the court are not in dispute in material respects, plaintiffs' motion for judgment could have been granted as a matter of law." We agree and affirm.

Since plaintiffs' motion for judgment should have been granted, it is not necessary to discuss defendant's contention that the trial court erred in the manner of its use of R.R. 4:50-1 and 2 in submitting the case to the jury.

Affirmed.

19680214


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.