Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zentz v. Toop

New Jersey Supreme Court


Decided: September 25, 1967.

JACK ZENTZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHARLES S. TOOP AND MARION TOOP, HUSBAND AND WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY AND/OR D/B/A LINCROFT SHOPPING CENTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. NATHAN SIEGEL, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND FRANK CORDASCO, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinions are reported at 92 N.J. Super. 105.

For affirmance -- Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis and Schettino. For reversal -- Justices Proctor and Haneman.

Per Curiam

[50 NJ Page 251]

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. Mr. Justice Proctor and Mr. Justice Haneman vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion.

19670925


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.