Decided: October 19, 1964.
J. BEIER THEURER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND WILLIAM L. PHELPS, ET AL., INTERVENERS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,
ANTHONY L. ROMANO, STEPHEN CAPPIELLO AND WALTER HAVENS, MEMBERS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS
Conford, Kilkenny and Lewis.
[85 NJSuper Page 142]
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Artaserse, Theurer v. Borrone , 81 N.J. Super. 188 (Law Div. 1963).
On the cross-appeal of the intervening taxpayers concerning assessment of costs, the order of the trial judge is affirmed, there being no showing of mistaken exercise of discretion in relation to the determination thereon.
No costs on the cross-appeal. Costs on the main appeal to go as of course.