Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Theurer v. Romano

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division


Decided: October 19, 1964.

J. BEIER THEURER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND WILLIAM L. PHELPS, ET AL., INTERVENERS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ANTHONY L. ROMANO, STEPHEN CAPPIELLO AND WALTER HAVENS, MEMBERS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS

Conford, Kilkenny and Lewis.

Per Curiam

[85 NJSuper Page 142]

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Artaserse, Theurer v. Borrone , 81 N.J. Super. 188 (Law Div. 1963).

On the cross-appeal of the intervening taxpayers concerning assessment of costs, the order of the trial judge is affirmed, there being no showing of mistaken exercise of discretion in relation to the determination thereon.

No costs on the cross-appeal. Costs on the main appeal to go as of course.

19641019


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.