Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

City of Summit v. Horton Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division


October 4, 1962

THE CITY OF SUMMIT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HORTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, ETC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ETC., AND TOWNVIEW MANOR A, A CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ETC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. CHARLES BORINSKY, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Before Judges Goldmann, Freund and Foley.

Per Curiam. After reviewing the lengthy record, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that the judgment must be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 70 N.J. Super. 529 (1961).

19621004


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.