Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
City of Summit v. Horton Corp.
October 4, 1962
THE CITY OF SUMMIT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HORTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, ETC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ETC., AND TOWNVIEW MANOR A, A CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ETC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. CHARLES BORINSKY, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Before Judges Goldmann, Freund and Foley.
Per Curiam. After reviewing the lengthy record, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that the judgment must be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 70 N.J. Super. 529 (1961).