Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act.
6. On May 16, 1956 Klein advised Davis of his troubles with the Department of Agriculture and requested Davis to help him by purchasing celery in New York City.
7. Davis agreed to purchase celery for Klein in New York City and for about one week billed Klein the exact purchase price with no mark-up or profit to Davis.
8. Thereafter, and continuing down to the present date, Davis has purchased celery for Klein in New York City three or four times a week, and has charged Klein the purchase price, plus a small mark-up, which said mark-up, Davis admits, is about one-half of that Davis charges all other customers of his.
9. From May 16, 1956 to June 29, 1956 Glucksman billed Klein for the trucking charges at the rate of 15 cents per crate of celery.
10. From June 29, 1956 to the present date Glucksman has billed Davis for the trucking charges at the rate of 15 cents per crate of celery.
11. From June 29, 1956 to July 26, 1956, Davis sold Klein over 2,000 crates of celery. Considering the cost of cartage, on 55% of these crates Davis made no profit; on 22% his profit per crate was 10 cents or less; on 17% his profit per crate was 35 cents or less; and on 6% it was over 35 cents per crate.
12. During the period from May 16, 1956 to July 26, 1956, Davis purchased as little as 50 crates of celery and as much as 222 crates of celery per day, but an average of about 140 crates of celery for Klein was purchased each day.
13. Davis only needed about 10 to 20 crates of celery per day for his own business and would never have purchased more than that amount of celery in New York City but for the orders he received from Klein. Until May 16, 1956 Davis purchased his celery from Klein.
14. From May 16, 1956 to the present date the celery in question has been brought from New York City to New Jersey to Martin Glucksman.
15. Glucksman would receive his orders generally from Klein and only occasionally from Davis as to where to pick up the celery in New York.
16. Glucksman, on bringing the celery to New Jersey, would first stop at Davis' store to drop off those few crates of celery Davis had purchased for himself, and would then continue to Klein's store to deliver the balance. On several occasions Glucksman would go directly from New York City to Klein's store. The main trip that Glucksman made from New York City was to Klein, and not Davis.
17. Klein has not changed his method of operations in any essential manner since May 16, 1956, with the sole exception that the purchase of the celery in New York City is now done on the credit of Davis, and not on the credit of Klein.
18. The purchase of the celery in New York City by Davis was for the sole purpose, so far as Klein was concerned, of permitting Klein to continue in business after his license had been suspended by the Secretary of Agriculture.
19. The purpose of Klein in his request of Davis to purchase celery in New York City was to create a means or device intended to remove these transactions from the provisions of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act.
Conclusions of Law
1. The court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the transaction.
2. The celery purchased in New York City and brought to New Jersey is normally in interstate commerce.
3. The purchase by Davis of the celery in New York City and the re-sale of the celery from Davis to Klein was a means or device intended to remove the transactions in respect thereto from the provisions of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act.
4. The purchase by Klein of celery from Davis under the arrangement between Klein and Davis was a purchase of commodities in interstate commerce.
5. Klein had to have a license to operate under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act.
6. Since June 26, 1956 the above purchases of celery by Klein have been in violation of the preliminary injunction entered in this cause.
7. Klein is in contempt of the preliminary injunction entered in this cause on June 26, 1956.
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.