Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cooper v. Kensil

Decided: December 20, 1954.

ARTHUR M. COOPER AND STANLEY FRANKEL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THEODORE J. KENSIL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT



Clapp, Jayne and Francis.

Per Curiam

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Haneman reported in 31 N.J. Super. 87 (Ch. Div. 1954).

It may be noted also as a fundamental matter that the remedy of specific performance is not available where the right is "dim." (Jayne, V.C., Cline v. Kurzweil , 141 N.J. Eq. 508, 514 (Ch. 1948), affirmed 1 N.J. 407 (1949)). Such relief is granted only when the right is clear, distinct and definite. DiCataldo v. Harold Corp. , 15 N.J. Super. 471 (Ch. Div. 1951); Montclair Distributing Co. v. Arnold ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.