Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ross v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

decided.: June 26, 1952.

JOSEPH A. ROSS
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.



Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

An examination of the record discloses substantial evidence of negligence to sustain the jury's verdict against the defendant.Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 323 U.S. 600, 604, 65 S. Ct. 545, 89 L. Ed. 490. Cf. Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 131 F.2d 327, 328.The evidence also shows that the plaintiff's act was not the sole efficient cause of the injury.A careful examination of the record and review of the briefs and oral argument convince us that the court below committed no prejudicial error. Consequently the judgment will be affirmed.

19520626

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.