Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Autenrieth v. Vliet

Decided: October 31, 1945.

JOSEPH HOWARD AUTENRIETH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CARRIE B. VLIET AND HARRY VLIET, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS



On appeal from the District Court.

For the defendants-appellants, Clancy & Murphy.

For the plaintiff-respondent, Biunno & Rothenberg (Ferdinand J. Biunno).

Before Justices Case, Bodine and Perskie.

Bodine

The opinion of the court was delivered bt

BODINE, J. Judgment in this case was for $103.50. The action arose because of the alleged violation of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, U.S.C.A. Title 50, ยง 205 (e), and the regulations promulgated thereunder, particularly Rev. M.P.R. 139 of March 24th, 1943.

On or about September 1st, 1943, the defendants sold to the plaintiff a 1932 Model L-57 Sparton refrigerator, serial B2675. The price paid was $45. The regulations provide

a price of $10.50 for such a refrigerator. The statute permits of triple damages in such case as were awarded here.

Clearly, the refrigerator was sold as an "As is" refrigerator. The contention was that because there was a new motor it was a reconditioned refrigerator, but there was no guarantee as in such case made and provided. Besides, the defendants were not dealers and the provision respecting the addition of the net cost of the replacement applies only to such group. Had there been a guarantee as required of the dealer the refrigerator must have been placed in working order. The replacement part cost $35.

The case seems a hard one. If the defendants had refrained from purchasing the replacement part they could have sold for $10.50 and saved the $35 they paid for the part. If they had been dealers and given a guarantee for one year's service, they could have sold for $45.50.

Courts, however, cannot change the acts of parties litigant nor can they rewrite laws. The act was extended to individual sales and the individuals sold at their peril, if they disregarded the act and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.