Decided: September 14, 1944.
JAMES CUNNINGHAM, RESPONDENT,
RICHARD ASHURST, APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 131 N.J.L. 260.
For the respondent, James M. Davis, Jr.
For the appellant, Howard Eastwood.
[132 NJL Page 170]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, DONGES, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 8.
For reversal -- CASE, HEHER, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 4.