Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zuest v. Ingra

New Jersey Supreme Court


Decided: July 17, 1944.

EDWARD ZUEST ET UX., RESPONDENTS,
v.
JOHN INGRA, APPELLANT

On appeal from the Orange District Court.

For the appellant, Louis Zemel.

For the respondents, Abraham M. Herman.

Before Justices Parker, Heher and Colie.

[132 NJL Page 38]

PER CURIAM.

The action is by tenants against their landlord to recover the penalty provided by section 205 (e) of the federal Emergency Price Control Act, in cases where rents of housing accommodations have been "stabilized" under that act. The cited section provides a penalty of thrice the excess over maximum price, or $50, whichever is the greater. The maximum rent officially fixed in this case was $27 per month, and the plaintiffs for two successive months paid rent of $30 to one Thomas Farina, taking his personal receipt for the same. On this evidence, judgment was rendered for the penalty of $50 per month.

We conclude that there was error. The case is barren of any direct evidence that the defendant, who became owner just prior to the collection of the $30, had directed any increase of rent, or had engaged Thomas Farina to collect the rent, or had received it from Thomas.

The action is for a penalty, and the law is settled that in a penal action against a master for the act of a servant the general rule of respondent superior in civil actions does not apply, and direct authority should be shown. 25 C.J. 1193-4: Roeber v. Society, 47 N.J.L. 237.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.

19440717


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.