Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Appley v. Township Committee of Township of Bernards

Decided: September 18, 1942.

JOSEPH E. APPLEY, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 128 N.J.L. 195.

For the appellant, Anthony P. Kearns.

For the respondent, Saul W. Arkus.

Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the careful and comprehensive opinion of Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court, ubi supra.

However, one irregularity in practice should not pass unnoticed. The case is submitted on briefs, and the brief for the appellant bears the signatures of two members of the bar as "of counsel" though one of them is not a counselor-at-law. If his signature had been the only one, the brief would have been rejected, pursuant to well settled rules. Duysters v. Crawford, 69 N.J.L. 229; Leaver v. Kilmer, 54 A. 817; reversed on other grounds, 71 N.J.L. 291; Moore v. Bradley Beach, 87 Id. 391, 395; Gadek v. Kugler, 6 N.J. Mis. R. 471; 141 A. 561; Hirsch v. DePuy, 11 N.J. Mis. R. 500; 166 A. 720. It has been considered, however, as the brief of the other signer, who is a counselor-at-law.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal -- ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.