Decided: January 9, 1942.
ANTOINETTE COVIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 125 N.J.L. 258.
For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence (John A. Hartpence and Charles J. Gormley, of counsel).
For the respondent, Collins & Corbin (Edward A. Markley, Charles W. Broadhurst and Raymond J. Lamb, of counsel).
[127 NJL Page 596]
Reargument of the issue joined in this cause was had pursuant to leave duly granted. It leaves us convinced that the judgment should be reversed, for the reasons set down in the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 126 N.J.L. 536. Appellant may proceed accordingly.
For affirmance -- CASE, DONGES, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, THOMPSON, JJ. 6.
For reversal -- THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, HEHER, COLIE, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 7.