Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rutgers v. Martin

Decided: January 9, 1942.

NICHOLAS G. RUTGERS ET AL., SUB. ADMRS., ETC., APPELLANTS,
v.
J.H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, RESPONDENT



On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 127 N.J.L. 35, sub nom. Nicholas v. Martin.

For the appellants, R.E. & A.D. Watson.

For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, Attorney-General, and William A. Moore, special counsel.

Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal -- ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.