Decided: January 9, 1942.
NICHOLAS G. RUTGERS ET AL., SUB. ADMRS., ETC., APPELLANTS,
J.H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, RESPONDENT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 127 N.J.L. 35, sub nom. Nicholas v. Martin.
For the appellants, R.E. & A.D. Watson.
For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, Attorney-General, and William A. Moore, special counsel.
[127 NJL Page 603]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal -- None.