Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lefkowitz v. Cohn

Decided: May 1, 1941.

DAVID J. LEFKOWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JACOB COHN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



On appeal from the Third Judicial District Court of Bergen County.

For the defendant-appellant, Sidney Cohn (Max Kleinfeld, of counsel).

For the plaintiff-respondent, Harold S. Okin (Edwin A. A. Muller, of counsel).

Before Justices Bodine, Porter and Colie.

Colie

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COLIE, J. This is an appeal by the defendant, Jacob Cohn, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $100 and costs. The state of case, as settled by the court, shows that the parties entered into a written contract by which Cohn agreed to sell Lefkowitz for $1,950, a cigar and stationery store, with the stock and good will and the seller's interest in a lease covering the premises. The contract further provided in part as follows:

"The seller covenants that neither he nor Herbert Cohn, will directly or indirectly, engage in the same or similar line of business within a radius of one-half mile for a period of five years, from the premises hereby agreed to be sold."

"The seller undertakes to obtain for the buyer a plenary retail liquor distribution license from the Borough of Palisades Park, provided that immediate application is made for

the same and provided further that no prior application is made to the Borough of Palisades Park for the same, being understood and agreed that said license is part of the consideration for the purchase price herein agreed to be paid; however, provided further that the buyer will make such application on behalf of a New Jersey corporation.

"The buyer hereby authorizes Mr. Sidney Cohn to proceed with the formation of a corporation at a price not to exceed $100 which corporation shall be the applicant for the license."

One week after the signing of the contract, Cohn executed a bill of sale to Lefkowitz covering the goods and chattels on the premises, together with the good will and therein agreed not to engage in the same or similar business as the contract provided. Cohn's agent and attorney promptly filed an application for the license which was denied and no appeal taken. In the meantime, Lefkowitz had paid out $100 in connection with the formation of the corporation called for in the written contract. There was testimony ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.