Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Frytez v. Gruchacz

Decided: January 28, 1941.

ALEKSC FRYTEZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
KATHERINE GRUCHACZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT



On appeal from the Essex County Circuit Court.

For the appellant, Rospond & Rospond (Felix Rospond, of counsel).

For the respondent, Thomas Brunetto.

Bodine

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BODINE, J. The appeal is from a judgment of nonsuit entered pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2:27-215. We find no abuse of discretion. Stein v. Goodenough, 73 N.J.L. 812.

An action was commenced in November, 1926, to recover on a note of April 23d, 1923, and for money advanced to the defendant during the years 1922 to 1925. Nothing seems to have been done in this cause till a default judgment was entered in 1939. This judgment was vacated and the service of a summons set aside. An earlier suit for the same cause of action was then discovered, and it is claimed that a notice of trial was then served on the defendant, her attorney being

dead. The plaintiff's attorney had not notified the defendant to employ an attorney. N.J.S.A. 2:20-6. It is not necessary, however, to decide whether that step should have been taken since the trial judge has entire control of his calendars, and we do not think a cause so long delayed in prosecution should have a place in the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 9.

For reversal -- THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, PERSKIE, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.