Decided: January 3, 1941.
ANTHONY SASKEL, RECEIVER, APPELLANT,
HARRY WEINBERGER, RESPONDENT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 125 N.J.L. 71.
For the appellant, Nathan Baker.
For the respondent, Edward Zubalsky.
[125 NJL Page 507]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.
For reversal -- None.