Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cadgene v. Cadgene

New Jersey Supreme Court


Decided: April 25, 1940.

MARIE CADGENE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JACQUES CADGENE ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bergen county) wherein the opinion of Judge Barbour is reported in 17 N.J. Mis. R. 332.

For the plaintiff-respondent, Morrison, Lloyd & Morrison.

For the defendants-appellants, Evans, Smith & Evans.

[124 NJL Page 566]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court, with this added observation -- that Judge Barbour, in support of his conclusions in the instant case, quoted from the opinion of the New York Supreme Court (Erie county) in Boehringer v. Schmid, 133 N.Y. Misc. Rep. 236; 232 N.Y. Supp. 360. It may be worthy to note that the judgment of the New York Supreme Court in that case was unanimously affirmed by the Court of Appeals of New York in a per curiam opinion reported in 254 N.Y. 355; 173 N.E. Rep. 220.

For affirmance -- THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 14.

For reversal -- None.

19400425


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.