Decided: April 25, 1940.
MARGARET STEINMETZ, RESPONDENT,
SNEAD & COMPANY, APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J.L. 497.
For the appellant, Kellogg & Chance.
For the respondent, William T. Cahill.
[124 NJL Page 450]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court and reported in 123 N.J.L. 497.
For affirmance -- THE CHIEF JUSTICE, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.
For reversal -- None.