Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martin v. Daymond

Decided: January 24, 1940.

ROBERT G. MARTIN, RELATOR,
v.
EDWARD W. DAYMOND, DEFENDANT



On information in the nature of a quo warranto.

For the relator, Richard J. Hughes.

For the defendant, Frank I. Casey.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Donges and Porter.

Porter

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PORTER, J. The question presented for solution on the pleadings is the right of the relator or of the defendant to the position of membership in the township committee of the township of Hamilton, in the county of Mercer. Both claim the office. The facts do not seem in dispute. It seems that on January 1st, 1938, the governing body of the township consisted of three members, William J. Steiner, Arthur J. Burgner and Harry E. Hartman.

On January 18th, 1938, Burgner resigned and the remaining members appointed Harry E. Lieberman to fill the vacancy. In the general election in 1938, Lieberman was defeated for the office by Armit A. Harrison for a term of three years from January 1st, 1939.

On December 6th, 1938, Hartman resigned leaving two members in office, Steiner and Lieberman. The vacancy caused by the Hartman resignation was not filled. On December 28th, 1938, Lieberman addressed to the township clerk and delivered to him his written resignation dated that day as a member to take effect immediately. That resignation if effective left the committee with but one member, Steiner. The governor of the state then immediately appointed relator to the alleged vacancy created by the resignation of Lieberman. His right to the office is challenged by the pleadings. At a meeting of the committee held January 3d, 1939, the newly elected member, Harrison, was inducted into office and with Steiner thus constituting a majority they appointed Daymond, the defendant, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Hartman.

The statute, R.S. 40:146-20, vests power in the governor to fill vacancies in township committees where all or a

majority of the members are disqualified by death, disability, removal, refusal to act or resignation upon certification to him of such vacancy by the township clerk. Such appointments to be for a period until a successor be elected and qualified at the next ensuing general election. It appears that the certification of the Lieberman resignation was duly made by the township clerk to the governor who thereupon appointed relator as herein above stated.

It will be noted that both Hartman and Lieberman constituting a majority or quorum of the committee resigned in December, 1938, a short time before the time for the organization of the new committee. At that time Hartman's term of office ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.