Decided: April 21, 1939.
ROSE FOLK ET AL., APPELLANTS,
HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J.L. 278.
For the appellant, Nathan Baker.
For the respondent, Samuel W. Zerman.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 14.
For reversal -- None.