Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Macmahon v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Rutherford

New Jersey Supreme Court


Decided: January 28, 1939.

ABBIE D. MACMAHON, RELATOR,
v.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF RUTHERFORD, RESPONDENT

On rule to show cause why writ of mandamus should not issue.

For the relator, Chandless, Weller & Selser.

For the respondent, Albert Bivona and James S. Ely.

Before Justices Case, Donges and Porter.

[121 NJL Page 610]

PER CURIAM.

Relator seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the borough authorities to cancel part of assessments for water, gas and sewer connections under an ordinance approved June 15th, 1926. Under the ordinances the borough made the connections. The ordinance was properly adopted. After due notice, the assessments were confirmed by the mayor and council on June 26th, 1928. The records disclose that relator was represented by her husband at the meeting when confirmation took place. Bills were rendered to relator and on September 18th, 1929, part of her assessments were paid. Nothing appears to have been done by relator until October, 1934, when she wrote a letter to the borough authorities protesting against a part of the assessment, and, thereafter, wrote other letters of protest. The present application was made on or about November 22d, 1937.

Without passing upon the propriety of mandamus to review the assessments, we are of opinion that the relator is not entitled to the relief sought because of her failure to take proceedings within a reasonable time.

The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.

19390128


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.