Decided: January 13, 1939.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR,
CHARLES ZEEK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 120 N.J.L. 322.
For the defendant in error, Orville V. Meslar.
For the plaintiff in error, J. Bernard Saltzman.
[121 NJL Page 584]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.
For reversal -- None.