Decided: May 19, 1937.
MARTIN TUCKER, RESPONDENT,
FRANK J. BELTRAMO, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 117 N.J.L. 72.
For the respondent, Isadore Rabinowitz.
For the appellant, Merritt Lane.
[118 NJL Page 301]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.
For reversal -- None.