Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tarburton v. Hagemann

Decided: October 20, 1936.

ELMER E. TARBURTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ALBERT C. HAGEMANN AND EDWARD POLE, PARTNERS, TRADING AS HAGEMANN & POLE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS



On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the defendants-appellants, Ralph W. Wescott and Louis B. LeDuc.

For the plaintiff-respondent French, Richards & Bradley (Floyd H. Bradley).

PER CURIAM.

The proofs examined, it clearly appears that a factual question arose as to whether the plaintiff was an invitee at the time of his injuries. This factual question was submitted to the jury by the learned trial judge in a fail and well balanced charge. Timannus v. DeWitt, 109 N.J.L. 168.

The judgment under review is affirmed.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 15.

For reversal -- ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.