Decided: October 2, 1936.
CARL J. RAHM, APPELLANT,
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 14 N.J. Mis. R. 224.
For the appellant, Joseph T. Lieblich.
For the respondents, Arthur T. Vanderbilt.
[117 NJL Page 149]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.
For reversal -- None.