Decided: October 2, 1936.
WALTER DRAGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS,
NATHAN GROSSMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 116 N.J.L. 182.
For the appellants, Abraham J. Isserman.
For the respondents, Hugh F. Doherty and Hicks, Kuhlthau & Thompson.
[117 NJL Page 147]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.
For reversal -- None.