Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Teitelbaum v. Massachusetts Accident Co.

Decided: May 14, 1936.

MAURICE TEITELBAUM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MASSACHUSETTS ACCIDENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; MAURICE TEITELBAUM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. MASSACHUSETTS ACCIDENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 811.

For the defendant-appellant, Herman E. Dultz.

For the plaintiff-respondent, Kanter & Kanter (Charles Kanter).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. It should, however, be noted that the plaintiff below admitted that he treated about four patients a week and not four patients a day as inadvertently stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 10.

For reversal -- ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.