Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Schoenberg v. O''Connor

Decided: May 14, 1936.

MORRIS SCHOENBERG, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CECELIA T. O'CONNOR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 14 N.J. Mis. R. 412.

For the appellant, Roberson & Roberson (Alfred Brenner, of counsel).

For the respondent, Edward Schwartz.

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the view of Judge Ackerson that plaintiff was entitled to rescind the contract of sale, because of the "unmarketability of title." Under the circumstances, he properly invoked the principle declared in Eisler v. Halperin, 89 N.J.L. 278, that, if acceptance of the proffered title would lay the

vendee "open to a fair probability of vexatious litigation with the possibility of serious loss," the title is unmarketable, and the vendee is justified in refusing to accept it.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 13.

For reversal -- ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.