Decided: January 31, 1936.
JOE BRUNO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
TURNER & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed:
For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.
For the respondent, Henry Harris.
[116 NJL Page 145]
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, LLOYD, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 11.
For reversal -- None.