On rule to show cause why writ of attachment should not be quashed.
For the rule, Kessler & Kessler.
Contra, Andrew B. Crummy.
Before Justices Lloyd, Case and Bodine.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
DONGES, J. This is a rule to show cause why a writ of attachment should not be quashed and a fund of $6,000 deposited with the clerk of the Supreme Court should not be released and paid to the defendant.
A writ of attachment was issued out of this court on October 10th, 1934, and three vessels, the Evelyn, the Helen and the Doris, were attached. Thereafter the vessels were released from the lien of the attachment upon defendant depositing $6,000 in court, and were sold.
The history of the case appears to be that on December 12th, 1932, these boats were seized by the United States coast guard for violation of the Prohibition act. On December 22d, 1932, libels were filed against them by the United States government. On December 24th, 1932, the United States marshal took the vessels into his custody where they remained down to and after the commencement of the attachment proceedings herein.
On May 29th, 1933, decrees were entered in the United States District Court for the district of New Jersey declaring the ships forfeited to the federal government. The owners appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals and on August 16th, 1934, that court reversed the decree of the District Court and ordered the libels dismissed. The government petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review this judgment and the petition was denied on October 22d, 1934. As stated above, on October 10th, 1934, while this petition was pending, the plaintiff caused the writ of attachment to be issued. On October 26th, 1934, the cause was remitted to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the libels. Up to this time the vessels had been in the custody of the United States marshal. The writ of attachment had
been executed on October 11th on one boat and on October 15th on the other two, by posting a copy of the writ on the vessels with the notation that the attachment was subject to any rights of the United States.
On November 2d the sheriff of Essex county placed a watchman on the Evelyn and the Helen. It is not clear from the stipulation of facts whether or not the sheriff of Hudson county ever took actual possession of the Doris, but it is immaterial.
On November 5th, 1934, the defendant entered a special appearance for the purpose of moving to quash the writ. On November 7th, Mr. Justice Bodine made an order releasing the vessels upon the payment into court of the sum of $6,000. On November 10th, the motion to quash came on ...