Decided: September 27, 1934.
ANTHIME DOWNING, RESPONDENT,
OXWELD ACETYLENE COMPANY, APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 112 N.J.L. 25.
For the respondent, Edward G. Burke.
For the appellant, Kellogg & Chance.
[113 NJL Page 399]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 9.
For reversal -- CASE, HETFIELD, WELLS, JJ. 3.