Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tieger v. Lundy

Decided: May 24, 1934.

MAX TIEGER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
v.
SAMUEL LUNDY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



For the defendant-appellant, Bolte & Tripician (Harry Miller).

For the plaintiff-respondent, John B. Baratta (William B. Hunter, Jr.).

PER CURIAM.

From an examination of the record in this case it is apparent that there were fact questions presented which were submitted by the trial judge to the jury in a charge that was faultless, so far as any question is presented for our determination.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 13.

For reversal -- ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.