Decided: January 5, 1934.
JOHN JOHNSON ET AL., APPELLANTS,
JOHN RIVARA ET AL., RESPONDENTS
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 677.
For the appellants, Judson B. Salisbury.
For the respondents, Huckin & Huckin.
[112 NJL Page 92]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.
For reversal -- None.