Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr

Decided: April 27, 1933.

GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD BAHR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT



On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 756.

For the prosecutor-appellant, Emil Neblo.

For the defendant-respondent, Kalisch & Kalisch.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N.J. Mis. R. 255.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal -- ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.