Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr

New Jersey Supreme Court


Decided: April 27, 1933.

GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD BAHR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 756.

For the prosecutor-appellant, Emil Neblo.

For the defendant-respondent, Kalisch & Kalisch.

[110 NJL Page 455]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N.J. Mis. R. 255.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal -- None.

19330427


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.