Decided: October 17, 1932.
FRANK M. SPRAGUE, RESPONDENT,
JOSEPH A. PENROSE ET AL., APPELLANTS
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 305.
For the respondent, Geran, Matlack & Lautman.
For the appellants, Walter Carson.
[109 NJL Page 347]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 10.
For reversal -- None.