Decided: October 17, 1932.
HYMAN HORDES, RESPONDENT,
J.I. KISLAK, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 1030.
For the appellant, John W. Ockford.
For the respondent, Saul Mendelson.
[109 NJL Page 413]
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra.
For affirmance -- TRENCHARD, CASE, DONGES, BROGAN, KAYS, WELLS, JJ. 6.
For reversal -- PARKER, VAN BUSKIRK, KERNEY, JJ. 3.