Decided: May 16, 1932.
ARTHUR L. KUGEL, RESPONDENT,
CHARLES M. RIEDELL, APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 360.
For the respondent, Milton M. Unger.
For the appellant, Harrison & Roche.
[109 NJL Page 269]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- PARKER, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.
For reversal -- None.