Decided: October 19, 1931.
ROSA E. GERSTLEY, RESPONDENT,
DAVID H. BEST ET AL., APPELLANTS
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 661.
For the respondent, Cassman & Gottlieb.
For the appellants, Babcock & Champion.
[108 NJL Page 189]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal -- None.