Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wilmar Co. v. County of Camden

Decided: April 24, 1931.

WILMAR COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
COUNTY OF CAMDEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS; WILMAR COMPANY, APPELLANT, V. COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CENTRAL AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS



On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 107 N.J.L. 230.

For the appellant, Joseph H. Carr.

For the respondents, Walter S. Keown, George D. Rothermel, Edward L. Katzenbach (Charles C. Savage, Jr., of the Pennsylvania bar, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgments under review will be affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court, ubi supra.

We note that the language of the resolution

of the board of freeholders is slightly misquoted. Instead of the word "lots for said new development," the resolution should read "lands for said new road." The difference is unimportant, but the correction is made in the interest of verbal accuracy.

No. 156 --

For affirmance -- THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 10.

For reversal -- None.

No. 157 --

For affirmance -- THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, VAN BUSKIRK, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.