Decided: February 2, 1931.
PAUL BENCSKO, RESPONDENT,
CAESAR A. CANNARA, APPELLANT
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 431.
For the respondent, John W. Palmer.
For the appellant, Stein, McGlynn & Hannoch.
[107 NJL Page 517]
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal -- None.