Decided: May 19, 1930.
ESTHER LEWIS, RESPONDENT,
M. & V. MOTOR COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND ANTHONY MANZO, APPELLANTS; FRANKLIN LEWIS, RESPONDENT, V. M. & V. MOTOR COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND ANTHONY MANZO, APPELLANTS
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 7 N.J. Mis. R. 638.
For the appellants, Donohue & O'Brien.
For the respondents, Addison P. Rosenkrans.
[106 NJL Page 572]
There is a mistake of fact in the per curiam of the Supreme Court, which states that verdicts were awarded to the plaintiff Esther Lewis for personal injuries, and to her husband, Franklin Lewis, for loss of services and expense of curing his wife. On the contrary the suits were for loss of the car and other personal property.
With the exception just mentioned the judgments under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 13.
For reversal -- None.